Union and retiree pressure mounting against multiemployer pension fund reform

Hazel Bradford
Pensions and Investments
October 29, 2013
A package of reform proposals to help the most troubled multiemployer pension funds is running into more opposition from some union and retiree advocates.
 
At a hearing held Tuesday by the House Education and the Workforce Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor and Pensions to consider possible legislation, members of the Retirement Security Review Commission discussed their reform proposals, which would allow for reduced benefits for future and possibly current retirees in the most troubled pension funds.
 
Those cuts are now opposed by the 37 million-member AARP, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Pension Rights Center and $8.4 billion IAM National Pension Fund, Washington.
 
“There is a battle brewing in the halls of Congress,” said R. Thomas Buffenbarger, president of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, after the hearing.
 
However, Randy DeFrehn, executive director of the National Coordinating Committee for Multiemployer Plans, which convened employers and labor unions as the Retirement Security Review Commission in order to come up with legislative fixes for all plans and remediation measures for the most troubled plans, told Pensions & Investments that despite the protests, “legislation is in the works.”
 
While the legislative solutions “will be painful,” said subcommittee Chairman Rep. Phil Roe, R-Tenn., “I believe we have a commitment on both sides now to do something.”
 
“At this point, I think we need to deal with reality,” Thomas Nyhan, executive director and general counsel of the severely underfunded $16.5 billion Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Rosemont, Ill., told committee members. “The longer we wait, the deeper the cuts will have to be.” The Central States pension fund was 53.9% funded as of Dec. 31.
Get Advice Join TDU Donate

Recent News

Union Membership Steady for 2019 at 16.4 million

That represents a slight decline in percentage of unionization, according the comprehensive annual report. The union advantage remains strong: "Union members had median usual weekly earnings of $1,095 in 2019, while those who were not union members had median weekly earnings of $892" That's $10,556 per year. Read the report.

'How this African American UPS worker challenged powerful union leaders in Philly, and won.'

by Juliana Feliciano Reyes, January 22, The Philadelphia Inquirer

"Around the country, rank and file union activists — from teachers to journalists to warehouse workers — have challenged the establishment, who they say is too complacent, too cozy with management, to fight for workers and keep corporations in check."

View More News Posts