Healthcare Giveback Stirs Backlash

May 24, 2013: Ken Hall vowed UPSers would not pay for our healthcare.

But under the tentative agreement, 140,000 UPSers would be moved into an inferior plan that will force them to pay a lot more for healthcare.

Just a few months ago, Teamsters turned out across the country in huge numbers to attend rallies and chant, "No way, we won't pay!"

Now healthcare concessions has gone from uniting Teamsters against UPS to uniting many members against the contract.

Opposition to the healthcare givebacks has run especially high in locals where both full-timers and part-timers would be moved into the Central States TEAMcare plan.

This includes Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, most of Ohio and Missouri, Southern California, and the Southwest.

TEAMcare would mean more deductibles, higher Rx costs, limited dental coverage, and higher co-pays on everything from ERs to lab tests, MRIs and procedures.

Members opposed to the cuts have passed out bulletins and FAQs put out by Make UPS Deliver at UPS and at contract meetings.

In Philadelphia Local 623, members printed up their own Vote No T-shirts and have flooded the air hub there.

"It feels good to walk around the second largest air hub in the U.S. and see nothing but Vote No T-shirts," said Local 623 member Bobby Curry.

A "Vote No on UPS Contract" Facebook page has connected 2,000 followers who are getting active around the healthcare concessions.

Some Western locals and New Jersey Local 177 got an extension to Nov. 1 to find an alternative plan. But they get the same reduced money from UPS to pay for coverage, which is less than members' current plan costs.

Any alternative to TEAMcare would only have to match the benefits in Central States TEAMcare, not the current plan.

UPS is making $5 billion a year and Teamsters were promised no concessions.

Why did the International Union agree to healthcare cuts?

"It seems ridiculous that a company earning record profits can't maintain what we already have," said Roger Austin from Local 215 in Evansville, Ind. "They seem to have forgotten they negotiate for us, not themselves."

Click here for Complete UPS Contract Coverage.


Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
Get Advice Join TDU Donate

Recent News

UPS Proposes 70-Hour Work Week

Teamsters United reports that UPS has a contract proposal on the table that gives the company the right to force package drivers to work up to 70 hours a week anytime they deem it necessary “to avoid service disruptions.”

 

In Divided Vote, IBT Moves Ahead with Pension Threat at ABF

(Reprinted from www.ABFTeamstersUnited.org) A divided IBT General Executive Board voted 13-9 to move ahead with the ABF ratification vote and rejected a motion to fix the pension freeze that threatens the retirement benefits of hundreds of ABF Teamsters.

View More News Posts