UPS’s Facebook Faceplant

Brown is forced to revise its illegal Social Media Policy.

UPS_fb_thumb.jpg

When UPS claimed the right to discipline Teamsters based on an illegal “Social Media Guidelines”, Hoffa-Hall gave management a pass. But Teamster action by a local union has forced UPS to make a U-turn.

As Facebook and Twitter took off, UPS issued employee “Social Media Guidelines” governing everything from online chat rooms and forums to blogs, and Facebook.

Management warned that “Activities that violate the standards outlined in these guidelines can lead to disciplinary action, including job termination.”

TDU pointed out that, “Brown’s guidelines banned virtually any online speech on union or workplace issues and clearly violate the National Labor Relations Act.”

The International Union had the right to bargain with UPS over the policy. But they never did. And sure enough, the company took advantage. Management disciplined members in multiple local unions for violating its social media guidelines.

Rhode Island Local 251 stepped up. When the company cited violations of its social media guidelines to justify disciplinary action, the local filed an Unfair Labor Practice charge.

Brown backed down. The company was forced to post a notice that members’ labor rights would be respected and that UPS would rescind Social Media Guidelines that “improperly restrict employees’ protected right to discuss wage, hours and working conditions with others.”

UPS has now issued new guidelines, including deleting language that allowed the company to discipline workers for criticizing managers or supervisors by banning “offensive posts that could harm someone’s reputation.”

The stand made by Local 251 strengthens the protections of all UPS Teamsters. But that doesn’t mean members can post anything they want about UPS without consequences.

You can be legally disciplined in some cases for what you post, even if it’s on your own time and on your personal Facebook page.

What are your rights? What are the limits? And what are some do’s and don’ts?

Protected Posts

Under federal law, you can use social media to criticize your employer, management or working conditions as long as you are engaged in “protected, concerted activity.”

Concerted activity happens when: 1) employees discuss wages, hours, or working conditions or union or TDU activity together, or; 2) one or more employees voice concern on an issue that impacts other co-workers (safety, for example) or 3) one or more employees discuss lawful union activity.

In short, if you are discussing your working conditions with coworkers, you have legal protections. But this does not mean that “anything goes”.

Posts that May Cross the Line

Here are some missteps that could still get you in trouble.

If you are posting comments about your employer that could be considered “egregious” or “disloyal” or if you’re posting work-related photos that have nothing to do with the union, the contract, TDU or improving wages and working conditions, then you may not be protected.

Extreme personal attacks against bosses or co-workers may not be protected. The legal test is whether your post is so “egregious” that it makes your continued employment untenable. Posting racist or sexist comments about co-workers or management is not protected. Neither are violent threats.

Criticizing your employer’s product, service or customers may not be protected. The issue here is “disloyalty” particularly if your comments could hurt the company’s business and are not made as part of a labor dispute.

Posting photos from when you’re on the job may or may not be protected. It’s one thing to post a photo of an unsafe working condition. It’s another to post a photo from the job that could hurt the employer's business or image.

Think Before You Post

Use common sense. Don’t post when you’re on the clock, unless you are clearly on break. If you would have to deny saying it if you were confronted by management, then you shouldn’t say it online.

Use social media to build Teamster unity and solidarity. Share information and have a laugh. But think before you post.


Showing 3 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • commented 2017-03-11 10:37:00 -0500
    Nice post!
  • followed this page 2016-10-05 12:25:35 -0400
  • commented 2016-03-11 10:00:04 -0500
    I’ve worked at the CHEMA hub for almost 10 years. A couple of years ago I used a pic I found on FB that had a green UPS logo, with the words “United Pot Smokers” as a profile pic. A few days later, 2 corporate guys, 2 high level security suits, and a shop steward gathered outside my feeder. They called me outside. One of the security guys had a 2 inch thick folder and pulled out a piece of paper with my profile page on it. They explained it wasn’t a big deal, but they’d like me to remove it. They said it was technically trademark infringement even though I didn’t produce it myself. Normally I would have told them to go sh!t in their hat. But, since they were nice about it, and weren’t trying to bust my balls, I took it off when I got home. I asked what brought it to their attention? They said that as an employee, if you type the letters ups it notifies them. Even if you type the phrase “I’ve had my ups and downs” They’ll get a notification. Be careful….Big brown brother is watching.
Get Advice Join TDU Donate

Recent News

Proposed “Butch Lewis Act” Introduced

The Butch Lewis Act to protect earned pensions was introduced at a press conference today, with the entire Democratic caucus in Congress lined up in support. Now the challenge is to continue the grassroots mobilization and lobbying effort to build bipartisan support for pension protection.

Butch Lewis

The pension protection bill is named in honor of Butch Lewis, who died in December 2015, and was an important leader in the pension protection movement. His widow, Rita Lewis, has carried on the fight and was a featured speaker at the Washington DC press conference.

View More News Posts