UPS Contract Vote Results

Bookmark/Search this post with

June 26, 2013: Updated 2:00 p.m. The UPS vote count is now completed. Keep reading to see a breakdown of the numbers by local and supplement.

Vote Totals

Supplement or Rider	National Agreement		Supplement/Rider
	Yes	No	Yes	No
Central Region Supplement	8,437	11,362	8,381	11,491
Louisville Local 89 Air Rider	609	4156	441	3,520
Ohio Rider	1,264	2,599	1,327	2,521
Wisconsin Local 344 Rider	1,007	376	965	406
Indianapolis Local 135 Rider	270	626	277	618
St. Louis Local 688 Rider	556	398	545	402
Michigan Rider	534	555	489	578
Southern Supplement	7,924	2,315	7,716	2,519
Western Supplement	4,288	5,376	4,340	5,260
Southwest Package & Sort Rider	1,746	4,455	1,765	4,372
Joint Council 28 Rider (Washington State)	422	165	435	149
Joint Council 37 Rider (Oregon)	341	118	349	109
Northern California Supplement	1,774	934	1,798	933
Central Pennsylvania Supplement	881	502	830	552
Local 177 Supplement (New Jersey)	1,025	1,899	1,150	1,875
Local 177 Mechanics (New Jersey)	37	79	44	72
Local 804 Supplement (Metro New York)	618	1,594	844	1,380
Atlantic Supplement	3,557	1,274	3,437	1,393
Latin AmericaInc Lu 769	18	61	16	63
Local 623 Supplement (Philadelphia)	195	888	227	756
Metro Philly Supplement	503	1,217	692	1,027
New England Supplement	3,686	636	3,673	645
Upstate New York Supplement	846	655	687	810
Western Pennsylvania Supplement	227	1,494	244	1,478
Local 926 Supplement	1	11	1	11
Local 901 Supplement (Puerto Rico)	44	6	42	8
UPS Cartage Services, Inc. Supplement	396	109	365	142
TCI Supplement	42	68	44	68
TOTAL	34,307	30,202

Central Region Supplement

Local	City	National Agreement		Supplement
		Yes	No	Yes	No
7	Battle Creek, Mich.	76	74	73	77
17	Denver	307	112	309	111
20	Toledo, Ohio	225	322	214	333
40	Mansfield, Ohio	35	33	35	32
41	Kansas City, Mo.	451	211	453	209
89	Lousiville, Ky.	609	4156	576	4381
90	Des Moines, Iowa	82	228	85	225
92	Canton, Ohio	68	99	56	111
100	Cincinnati	74	766	77	762
120	Minneapolis	235	175	238	171
135	Indianapolis	270	626	265	630
164	Jackson, Mich.	16	32	17	32
200	Milwaukee, Wis.	6	0	6	0
215	Evansville, Ind.	4	104	4	92
236	Paducah, Ky.	14	30	12	31
238	Cedar Rapids, Iowa	112	197	115	193
243	Detroit	339	515	356	495
245	Springfield, Mo.	94	22	92	23
332	Flint, Mich.	33	69	31	72
337	Detroit, Mich.	24	27	24	26
344	Milwaukee	1007	376	988	393
346	Duluth, Minn.	107	20	103	24
348	Akron, Ohio	140	30	139	33
377	Youngstown, Ohio	46	89	49	85
406	Grand Rapids, Mich.	354	195	346	205
407	Cleveland	390	195	380	202
413	Columbus, Ohio	116	561	128	547
455	Denver	521	198	526	196
554	Omaha, Neb.	280	192	276	197
580	Lansing, Mich.	31	138	35	134
637	Zanesville, Ohio	52	143	51	144
638	Minneapolis	1089	301	1088	305
651	Lexington, Ky.	213	207	212	208
688	St. Louis	556	398	550	401
696	Topeka, Kan.	161	27	159	29
795	Wichita, Kan.	137	28	137	28
823	Joplin, Mo.	45	5	45	5
908	Lima, Ohio	27	77	28	76
957	Dayton, Ohio	68	273	79	262
964	Brookpark, Ohio	23	11	23	11
TOTAL		8,437	11,262	8,380	11,491

Southern Supplement Results

Local	City	National Agreement		Supplement
		Yes	No	Yes	No
79	Tampa, Fla.	587	413	575	427
217	Jackson, Tenn.	53	10	54	9
270	New Orleans	280	80	280	81
373	Fort Smith, Ark.	134	26	133	27
385	Orlando, Fla.	409	169	334	244
402	Decatur, Ala.	78	10	75	13
480	Nashville, Tenn.	321	205	308	217
512	Jacksonville, Fla.	297	51	291	56
516	Muskogee, Okla.	181	45	180	48
519	Knoxville, Tenn.	292	180	283	189
568	Shreveport, La.	103	29	95	37
577	Lubbock, Texas	157	10	154	12
612	Birmingham, Ala.	404	31	397	35
657	Austin, Texas	471	87	462	95
667	Memphis, Tenn.	146	104	141	108
728	Atlanta	879	302	864	314
745	Dallas	70	13	70	13
767	Forest Hill, Texas	994	201	974	218
769	Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.	613	91	612	94
878	Little Rock, Ark.	170	46	170	46
886	Oklahoma City	213	26	212	29
891	Jackson, Miss.	346	53	339	57
988	Houston	493	93	482	108
991	Mobile, Ala.	233	40	231	42
TOTAL		7924	2315	7716	2519

Western Supplement Results

Local	City	National Agreement		Supplement
		Yes	No	Yes	No
2	Butte, Mont.	136	27	139	25
38	Everett, Wash.	35	22	34	23
58	Vancouver, Wash.	55	10	58	7
63	Ontario, Calif.	401	817	405	811
104	Phoenix	291	575	313	514
162	Portland, Ore.	341	118	353	105
174	Seattle	422	165	429	155
186	Simi Valley, Calif.	16	143	16	142
190	Billings, Mont.	59	15	59	15
206	Eugene, Ore.	41	24	41	24
222	Salt Lake City	369	48	370	46
231	Bellingham, Wash.	63	4	62	4
252	Centralia, Wash.	44	13	51	6
313	Tacoma, Wash.	52	11	54	10
315	North Bay, Calif.	227	142	223	145
324	Salem, Ore.	61	7	61	7
396	Covina, Calif.	463	1742	464	1736
481	San Diego	7	25	7	25
483	Boise, Idaho	128	31	130	29
492	Albuquerque, N.M.	155	112	151	114
495	Covina, Calif.	13	30	13	30
542	San Diego	144	363	142	365
572	Carson, Calif.	41	147	42	146
589	Port Angeles, Wash.	44	7	44	7
631	Las Vegas	64	124	71	116
670	Hermiston, Ore.	30	11	29	11
690	Spokane, Wash.	87	146	88	142
760	Yakima, Wash.	54	2	53	11
839	Pasco, Wash.	30	4	32	2
952	Orange County, Calif.	155	340	158	337
959	Anchorage, Alaska	67	15	71	11
962	Bend, Ore.	147	17	146	17
983	Pocatello, Idaho	30	2	30	2
986	Santa Maria, Calif.	11	92	12	91
996	Hawaii	56	32	55	33
TOTAL		4288	5376	4340	5260

Northern California Supplement

Local	City	National Agreement		Supplement
		Yes	No	Yes	No
70	San Leandro, Calif.	166	73	165	73
87	Bakersfield, Calif.	37	3	36	4
137	Redding, Calif.	115	14	114	15
150	Sacramento, Calif.	263	113	262	114
287	San Jose, Calif.	56	283	56	283
315	Martinez, Calif.	227	142	223	145
386	Modesto, Calif.	52	18	52	18
431	Fresno, Calif.	123	7	121	9
439	Lathrop, Calif.	72	9	70	11
533	Reno, Nev.	200	21	229	18
665	Santa Rosa, Calif.	139	24	139	24
856	San Bruno, Calif.	40	10	41	9
890	Salinas, Calif.	25	11	25	11
912	Watsonville, Calif.	22	16	22	16
948	Visalia, Calif.	56	2	56	2
2785	San Francisco	181	188	187	181
TOTAL		1774	934	1798	933

Central Pennsylvania Supplement

Local	City	National Agreement		Supplement
		Yes	No	Yes	No
229	Scranton, Pa.	57	37	52	41
401	Wilkes Barre, Pa.	96	21	98	20
429	Wyomissing, Pa.	74	37	72	39
764	Milton, Pa.	98	54	102	50
771	Lancaster, Pa.	112	35	108	37
773	Bethlehem, Pa.	117	78	118	77
776	Harrisburg, Pa.	327	240	280	288
TOTAL		881	502	830	552

Local 177 Supplement (New Jersey)

Local	National Agreement		Supplement
	Yes	No	Yes	No
177	1025	1899	1150	1875
Mechanics	37	79	44	72

Local 804 Supplement (Metro New York)

Local	National Agreement		Supplement
	Yes	No	Yes	No
804	618	1594	844	1380

Atlantic Area Supplement

Local	City	National Agreement		Supplement
		Yes	No	Yes	No
22	Danville, Va.	107	61	106	62
29	Waynesboro, W. Va.	134	40	100	72
61	Asheville, N.C.	136	175	124	187
71	Charlotte, N.C.	235	149	234	150
171	Roanoke, Va.	147	58	143	61
175	South Charleston, W. Va.	212	86	211	88
322	Richmond, Va.	211	82	204	87
355	Baltimore	320	101	319	102
391	Greensboro, N.C.	739	156	703	196
453	Cumberland, M.D.	12	12	13	11
509	Columbia, S.C.	458	133	447	143
639	Washington, D.C.	528	117	525	119
697	Wheeling, W. Va.	11	43	9	45
822	Norfolk, Va.	177	24	177	24
992	Hagerstown, Md.	130	37	122	46
TOTAL		3557	1274	3437	1393

Local 623 Supplement (Philadelphia)

Local	National Agreement		Supplement
	Yes	No	Yes	No
623	195	888	227	756

Metro Philly Supplement

Local	National Agreement		Supplement
	Yes	No	Yes	No
326	120	30	118	30
331	15	58	17	56
384	226	792	384	634
676	142	337	173	307
TOTAL	503	1217	692	1027

New England Supplement

Local	City	National Agreement		Supplement
		Yes	No	Yes	No
25	Boston	1165	70	1160	74
42	Lynn, Mass.	108	11	107	11
59	Cape Cod, Mass.	118	22	116	21
170	Worcester, Mass.	182	157	181	159
191	Bridgeport, Conn.	210	14	211	12
251	Providence, R.I.	238	47	238	49
340	Portland, Maine	293	46	293	47
404	Springfield, Mass.	142	27	142	27
443	Wallingford, Conn.	85	17	83	18
493	Uncasville, Conn.	109	13	108	15
597	Burlington, Vt.	157	12	158	12
633	Manchester, N.H.	312	50	309	51
653	South Easton, Mass.	108	22	110	20
671	Bloomfield, Conn.	293	79	292	80
677	Waterbury, Conn.	166	49	165	49
TOTAL		3686	636	3673	645

Upstate/West New York Supplement

Local	City	National Agreement		Supplement
		Yes	No	Yes	No
118	Rochester, N.Y.	142	49	136	55
182	Utica, N.Y.	38	6	39	5
264	Buffalo, N.Y.	31	7	30	8
294	Albany, N.Y.	157	243	145	255
317	Syracuse, N.Y.	177	137	100	212
449	Buffalo, N.Y.	167	159	127	199
529	Troy, N.Y.	24	9	23	10
687	Potsdam, N.Y.	60	23	45	37
693	Binghamton, N.Y.	50	22	42	29
TOTAL		846	655	687	810

Western Pennsylvania Supplement

Local	City	National Agreement		Supplement
		Yes	No	Yes	No
30	Jeanette, Pa.	91	646	96	642
110	Ebensburg, Pa.	45	131	51	125
249	Pittsburgh	30	432	30	432
261	New Castle, Pa.	9	84	9	84
397	Erie, Pa.	15	65	16	64
491	Uniontown, Pa.	5	22	6	21
538	Worthington, Pa.	19	63	23	59
585	Washington, Pa.	12	40	12	40
926	Pittsburgh	1	11	1	11
TOTAL		227	1494	244	1478

Local 926 Supplement (Pittsburgh, PA)

Local	National Agreement		Supplement
	Yes	No	Yes	No
926	1	11	1	11

Local 901 Supplement (Puerto Rico)

Local	National Agreement		Supplement
	Yes	No	Yes	No
901	44	6	42	8

UPS Cartage Services, Inc. Supplement

Local	City	National Agreement		Supplement
		Yes	No	Yes	No
17	Denver	7	0	7	0
25	Boston	19	2	17	3
41	Kansas City	7	0	7	0
70	San Leandro, Calif.	2	8	1	9
71	Charlotte, N.C.	11	0	11	0
89	Louisville	5	4	4	5
100	Cincinnati	7	0	7	0
107	Philadelphia	7	0	7	0
162	Portland, Ore.	13	1	11	3
174	Seattle	6	2	6	2
222	Salt Lake City	10	0	10	0
243	Detroit	11	1	11	1
294	Albany, N.Y.	7	1	8	1
295	Valley Stream, N.Y.	37	8	37	9
317	Syracuse, N.Y.	1	2	1	2
344	Milwaukee, Wis.	8	1	8	1
385	Orlando, Fla.	10	1	0	11
391	Charlotte, N.C.	4	1	4	1
406	Grand Rapids, Mich.	4	1	4	1
407	Cleveland	8	1	7	2
413	Columbus, Ohio	5	20	5	20
480	Nashville, Tenn.	11	2	4	9
500	Philadelphia	6	3	6	3
509	Columbia, S.C.	3	0	3	0
516	Oklahoma	4	0	4	0
519	Knoxville, Tenn.	2	0	2	0
542	San Diego	5	0	5	0
560	Union City, N.J.	16	0	16	0
592	Richmond	1	0	1	0
600	St. Louis	3	2	3	2
633	Manchester, N.H.	1	0	0	1
638	Minneapolis	10	0	10	0
651	Lexington, Ky.	3	3	3	3
657	San Antonio	13	0	14	0
667	Memphis, Tenn.	1	0	1	0
671	Bloomfield, Conn.	4	1	3	1
688	St. Louis	1	1	1	1
710	Chicago	10	1	10	1
728	Atlanta	14	8	9	13
745	Dallas	34	6	34	7
769	Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.	5	10	5	10
776	Harrisburg, Pa.	11	0	11	0
822	Norfolk, Va.	1	0	1	0
901	San Juan, P.R.	1	0	1	0
957	Dayton, Ohio	2	0	2	0
986	Santa Maria, Calif.	38	18	37	19
988	Houston	8	0	7	1
TOTAL		396	109	365	142

TCI Supplement

Local	National Agreement		Supplement
	Yes	No	Yes	No
TCI	21	34	22	34

Issues:

TDU UPS Freight Network

UPS

Log in or register to post comments
Printer-friendly version

Comments

Dana Tindall replied on Sat, 06/22/2013 - 4:48am Permalink

Ballots

It amazes me that such an important election that affects so many people was tainted by the mere fact that the IBT did not ensure that every single union member received a ballot. The integrity of the democratic process was compromised and disrespected. It is shameful and puts a blemish on those representatives responsible that they may not recover from. So many people received their ballots on Thursday and so many have yet to see a ballot at all. It was their "right" as a dues paying TEAMSTERS to cast their vote and have it counted with the thousands of others across the country. I hope there can be a way to rectify this terrible injustice and have those mentioned held accountable.

marc caporrimo replied on Sun, 06/23/2013 - 4:33pm Permalink

Contract Vote

Whats the difference! This terrible contract should never have even been mailed to us at all. For all locals to support this is a disgrace to the 20plus that I have been a dues paying member. We have given up so many benefits that took years to achieve all the while the company is making billions more each year. Deep pocketed Teamster leaders and crooks for upper management have destroyed all that we have worked so hard for. At a time like this when we should be looking forwadr and being rewarded for hard years of service, this contract if it passes not only screws us but it screws all the hard working retirees before us. Everyone one of you should be ashamed of the terrible contract you have presented to us, From james Hoffa himself down to the local pee-ons in all of your local unions. Our retirement and health care benefits have been turned up sidfe down. Quite frankly these benefits suck and will only get worse in years to come. Vote NO.... Help the greedy Bastards lose millions. Go ON STRIKE......

ron replied on Sun, 06/23/2013 - 2:13pm Permalink

national contact vote

I do not understand how anyone can vote yes to this contract. all who do must have there heads examined you follow what Hoffa and Hall gas said and you will live to regret the garbage that they have gotten u ....... Unbelievably ignorant.

Gerardo Jaime replied on Mon, 06/24/2013 - 2:33am Permalink

contract

Agree 100%. But local 396 voted down the contract. The east is to blame for the yes votes

al oliveri replied on Mon, 06/24/2013 - 11:57am Permalink

Not all the east Local 177 nj

Not all the east Local 177 nj 804 ny voted it down big time

joel dove replied on Mon, 06/24/2013 - 10:54pm Permalink

All the union officials who

All the union officials who put the hard sell to the members need to voted out when they run again

robert alber replied on Mon, 06/24/2013 - 10:53pm Permalink

national contract vote

I agree 100%, this contract better not pass or we are all screwed big time. What ever happened to Hoffa statement WE WILL NOT GIVE BACK OUR HEALTHCARE BENEFITS!!!! The union had ups by the short hairs and now its oh we will find you a comparable healthcare package. BULL S..T!!!!! This is not how the union should be fighting for us...............

M W replied on Sun, 06/23/2013 - 8:13pm Permalink

Ballot Return

33% vote? Wow! UPS is reading this loud and clear!

local 150 replied on Mon, 06/24/2013 - 8:52am Permalink

Weak contract

It's amazing how many people don't read what they are voting for. It's also disappointing that people are willing to settle for less than what they had in the previous contract. Blame the "Yes" voters for the coming BS we will have to endure until 2018. I guess small minds can only comprehend so much... And to all those who got a ballot and didn't vote...Hoffa thanks you!

Al VanScoy replied on Mon, 06/24/2013 - 12:50pm Permalink

UPS health benifits

We need to have a "maintenance of benefits" clause. NOTHING less than we currently have.

Billy B replied on Mon, 06/24/2013 - 2:18pm Permalink

I cannot believe the yes vote

I cannot believe the yes vote has it. People have forgotten what's been going on with this company. Strike was the only message they should have gotten.

Tyler replied on Mon, 06/24/2013 - 3:40pm Permalink

Local 177 Stop Saddle Brook Sunday Sort

Local 177 Stop Saddle Brook New Jersey Sunday Sort.

since August 2010 we've been working Sundays. Stop the Sunday Sort or the contracts will never pass!!

Johnny replied on Mon, 06/24/2013 - 6:36pm Permalink

RIGHT TO WORK STATES & PART TIMERS

This needs to be a wake up call for the part-timers in right-to-work states such as Texas. The full-timer's voted "Yes" as their medical benefits were not affected by a move into Central States medical plan as they are currently enrolled in that plan. Yes, I'm a part-timer who is a member. For those non-member part-timers out there reading this site - do the math: your annual out of pocket medical costs after getting pushed into Central States medical plan will exceed what your union dues and receiving the right to vote on this (IMO horrid) contract would total annually. The local does not, IMO, do enough to get part timer's signed up but the responsibility lies with you - not the business agent. (Please don't digress into right-to-freeload states, the point I'm trying to convey is part-timer's need to be more involved in the union since medical benefits are the primary reason many of us work at UPS.)

Darren replied on Mon, 06/24/2013 - 10:37pm Permalink

I would like to see separate

I would like to see separate contracts for loaders and drivers in the future...

william replied on Tue, 06/25/2013 - 12:30am Permalink

9.5

I'm sick of this week 9.5 language. I'm a swing driver and have no recourse. Its BS! Simplify the Language Mr Hall so its fair for all drivers.

Hours 8.0 to 9.5 = Time and a Half

Hours 9.5 to 11 = Double time

Hours 11 to end = Triple time

Pretty simple...It includes everyone and there is no more of this filing 9.5 nonsense that opens the door for harrasment, not to mention its time consuming for stewards and everyone involved.

Bob replied on Tue, 06/25/2013 - 12:47pm Permalink

Local 177 Sunday Sort

Amen Tyler! Amen!

And, so true

https://tdu.org/comment/111068#comment-111068

bill anderson replied on Thu, 06/27/2013 - 8:12pm Permalink

unions

Union should act like agents period. Unions should not be handling our retirement pentions nor health care. Smart Unions should not be taken on anything that's a liability. So everyone reading this answer this question: Why would Hoffa and Hall, who by the way supported the affordable care act, would want to take on such a monster of a liability? They messed up the central states retirement plan before and now and they think they can do wonders with our health care.

DON replied on Fri, 06/28/2013 - 7:25pm Permalink

CONTACT HOFFA @ HALL

LETS HOFFA @ HALL KNOW THEY WORK FOR THE TEAMSTER NOT 4 UPS. WE CANNOT CHANGE THE NATIONAL CONTACT. BUT WE CAN KEEP VOTING NO TILL WE GET WHAT WE WANT IN THE SUPPLEMENTS. THE LAST SUPPLEMENT TO SETTLE ON A CONTACT WILL GET THE MOST OUT OF UPS. SO STICK TO WHAT U WANT IN YOUR SUPPLEMENTS@ SHOW UPS HOFFA @ HALL THAT WE WILL STAND STRONG REMEMBER UPS IS GOING 2 FEEL THE PRESSURE FROM THE SHIPPERS.BECAUSE AUGUST 1 LOOKS LIKE A GOOD TIME 2 STRIKE. LET SEE WHAT LOCAL SUPPLEMENT WHO GETS THE MOST. NEXT ELECTION REMEMBER NOT 2 VOTE 4 THE GUYS WHO WANTED THIS CONTACT THEY MUST GO. VOTE NNNNNOOOOO!!!!! VOTE NO LETS STRIKE . I GUESS HOFFA @ HALL DID NOT CARE WHAT THE MEMBER SHIP WANT.NO CHANGE IN THE HEALTH CARE, 9.5 , WAGES, ECT. TELL HOFFA @ HALL READ THE SURVEYS THAT THE MEMBERS WANT NOT WHAT HE WANTS.

bob replied on Wed, 07/10/2013 - 12:40pm Permalink

Stop the Sunday Sort!!

Stop the SUNDAY Sort at the Saddle Brook NJ Hub!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Teamsters for a Democratic Union

Working together for a stronger union