Lessons from the 1997 UPS Strike

Twenty years ago, Teamster members won labor’s biggest victory in decades in the 1997 UPS strike. How did it happen—and what are the lessons for today?

ups1997_thumb.jpg

UPS management is on the offensive. The Hoffa years have brought contract givebacks and go-along, getalong labor relations.

Harassment and contract violations are up—and members’ faith in the union leadership is at an all-time low.

The 20th anniversary of the 1997 contract victory is a chance to remember that we can build union power, fight back and win.

The Stakes

The 1997 UPS contract fight was a high-stakes showdown over Teamster jobs and benefits.

UPS wanted to take over members’ pensions. Management’s goal was to freeze pension benefits—and eventually replace our pension with a 401k.

UPS wanted the right to increase subcontracting of good feeder jobs. Low-wage part-time jobs were on the rise.

For years, UPS had been cutting costs by shifting toward low-wage part-time work. In 1962, Hoffa Sr. allowed UPS to use part-time workers. In 1982, the IBT let UPS cut parttime wages to $8 an hour.

By 1990 half of all UPS workers were part-timers. Unless something was done a clear majority of UPS jobs were going to be part-time.

Ron Carey, a former UPS driver and the first democratically-elected General President in Teamster history, decided to draw the line in the 1997 contract.

Contract Campaign

The 1997 strike began on August 4 and was won 15 days later.

But the seeds of the victory were planted a year earlier when the International Union launched a contract campaign to mobilize members and prepare for contract negotiations.

The IBT pulled members off the job to work full-time for a year to reach out to members and organize rallies and workplace actions on bold contract demands.

Over 100,000 Teamsters signed petitions telling UPS that, “We’ll Fight for More Full-Time Jobs.”

Tens of thousands of Teamsters used high-pitched whistles in the hubs to “blow the whistle” on supervisors working and subcontracting.

When old-guard officials refused to support the campaign, the IBT field staff worked directly with shop stewards and members. TDU activists worked with the International to implement the campaign.

Contract Expiration Showdown

At the bargaining table, management refused to budge on the core issues of pensions, subcontracting and full-time jobs.

The day before the contract expired, management made a “final offer” and demanded that it be put to a membership vote.

Carey refused to put the weak offer to a vote.

At the request of a federal mediator, Carey agreed to have negotiations continue for three days past the deadline.

But management refused to budge—and on August 4 the strike was on.

Public Stands with Us

For 15 days, Teamster members shut down UPS nationwide. Teamsters rallied with labor and community allies under the slogan, “PartTime America Won’t Work.”

The public stood with union members who were fighting for good jobs and against the trend toward lowwage part-time jobs.

Our union organized drivers to “walk their routes” to deliver leaflets and window signs to customers.

A Gallup poll done during the strike showed that the public supported Teamster strikers over the company by a 2 to 1 margin.

Facing defeat, management caved in on every major contract issue.

The Victory

To settle the strike, UPS agreed to create 10,000 new full-time jobs by combining 20,000 part-time jobs. These were the first 22.3 full-time jobs won in Teamster history.

UPS also agreed to raise pensions by as much as 50 percent —and to drop its demand to take over Teamster pensions.

The company agreed to new restrictions on subcontracting feeder work.

The contract also included the biggest wage increases ever at that time.

The Hoffa Hangover

Under Hoffa, employers have gone on the offense and the contract campaign has been put on the shelf.

The Hoffa crowd talks tough and settles short—and then sells the contract. But increasingly, members aren’t buying the sales job.

Many UPS and UPS Freight Teamsters voted no on the last contract—and got stuck with givebacks anyway.

Contract campaigns launched by Teamsters United give members a tool to win better contracts.

After carhaul Teamsters organized and voted 87 percent no, they defeated wage freezes and won job protections.

Let’s put that formula to work. United, we win!


Contract Campaigns that Can Win

What’s the difference between a real contract campaign and the phony Hoffa version?

Concessions Scare Tactics

Under Hoffa, it’s a common tactic for the IBT to publicize management demands for concessions to lower members’ expectations. When UPS management demanded concessions in 1997, Teamster leaders broke off negotiations. The 1997 contract campaign was about winning bold new gains.

No Brownouts

Under Hoffa, members have been kept in the dark or issued vague contract updates. In 1997, UPSers were kept informed about exactly what we were fighting for—and what members could do to win these demands.

Membership Action

A real contract campaign is a lot more than a Facebook page or photo ops. In 1997, members held rallies and job actions on specific contract demands from full-time jobs to job security.

Contract Expiration Leverage

Management tries to scare members that UPS will lose customers if we don’t settle the contract early. This is a trick to get members to settle early, settle short and accept a weak contract.


Showing 4 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • commented 2017-08-07 11:36:02 -0400
    Wow

    FedEx accomplished all that during a 2 week strike!!
    Me smells a ’ old guard’ troll!!
  • commented 2017-08-06 13:14:36 -0400
    the UPS strike was a disaster for organize labor. it gave fed ex the money to buy RPS now FED EX ground, the trucking companies that became fed ex freight. FedEx continues to gain market share from teamster companies that are saddled with legacy cost. FedEx continues to build capacity, when it achieves parity with UPS it can dictate price and drive ups out of business. Or the most likely scenario a great reduction in UPS employees compensation. Open your eyes people TDUs agenda is not in the best interest of UPS teamsters.
  • commented 2017-08-05 16:24:26 -0400
    💰💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💰
    💰💵LAWYERS n LOVE💵💰
    💰 💵💵💵💵💵💵💵💵 💰

    Then came HOFFA a name to live. In Labor INFAMY
  • commented 2017-08-05 08:49:19 -0400
    Having been a part of the 97 strike (and the 94 over 70s strike) I’m hearing the same rhetoric from the company. “Volume is up but the packages aren’t profitable. We are losing money delivering these packages”
    The word in 97 was that the company wanted the strike to occur so that contracts with shippers would be void and renegotiable.
    Could this be the plan in 2018?
Get Advice Join TDU Donate

Recent News

First Look at UPS Contract Proposals

The proposals have been approved for the UPS national contract. Here are some of the issues that will be on the table when negotiations begin in January.  (Reprinted from www.TeamstersUnited.org)

first-look-thumb.jpg

UPS Bargaining Proposals Set

The Teamster bargaining demands for the UPS contract were approved by representatives from UPS locals today at the Two-Person meeting held near Washington, DC. (reprinted from www.TeamstersUnited.org)

View More News Posts