Is Ken Hall Really the Guy to Save Teamster Pensions?

Removed as the IBT’s lead negotiator at UPS, Ken Hall announced he will focus on pension issues. Teamsters should be worried.

ken_hall_unity_thumb.jpg

Addressing a meeting of Teamster local officers before the UPS national grievance panel in San Antonio, Ken Hall announced that he will step aside from future UPS contract negotiations to concentrate on being General Secretary Treasurer and to focus on pension issues.

Is that a good thing?

Ken Hall’s record at defending Teamster pensions and benefits is not pretty—to put it mildly.

The last time that Hall focused on pension issues he let UPS withdraw from the Central States Pension Fund.

The deal saved UPS big-time, but it sealed the fate of the Central States fund.  

Without contributions from the union’s biggest employer, Central States will go insolvent within a decade, unless the federal government saves the plan by passing pension reform.

Hundreds of thousands of Teamsters and retirees are threatened with losing their pensions.

And what about the 50,000 UPS Teamsters who are covered by the IBT-UPS pension plan that Hall created? They get the lowest pension benefits of any UPS Teamsters in the country.  

Ken Hall didn’t start the decline of the Central States Pension Fund. But he finished the job by putting the decisive nails in the coffin.

Now, he’s going to focus on pension issues? How much more of Ken Hall’s “help” can Teamster members take?


Showing 2 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • edward martin
    commented 2017-03-11 07:35:39 -0500
    its obvious the teamster have no clue running pensions plans, they need to get out or all the plans are doomed!!!!!!
  • Bruce Swearingen
    commented 2017-03-09 19:26:53 -0500
    $ LAWYERS n LOVE $

    If things go sour will this Hoffa " stand in ", designate a " stand in " for culpability?
    This new "rule " for Officers Accountability could get a little dicey !
Get Advice Join TDU Donate

Recent News

Why a No Vote Does Not Mean a UPS Strike

The International Union is trying to scare UPSers into accepting contract givebacks by sending out a new postcard that threatens members with the possibility a strike at UPS. A No Vote does not mean a strike at UPS. Here’s why.

UPS & UPS Freight Deals Increase Subcontracting

One of the biggest lies in Hoffa’s Vote Yes campaign is that the UPS and UPSF contracts represent a victory over subcontracting. That’s a joke.

View More News Posts