The History of the “2/3 Rule” on Teamster Contracts

By Ken Paff, TDU National Organizer — As we continue to vigorously demand that the Hoffa administration renegotiate, we need to look to the future. We need a new leadership and a new direction. To make that future, we need to understand the past.

With their clumsy attempt to impose the largest Teamster contract by minority rule, the Hoffa leadership has proven beyond a doubt that their loyalty is to themselves and their employer friends.

As we continue to vigorously demand that the Hoffa administration renegotiate, we need to look to the future. We need a new leadership and a new direction.

To make that future, we need to understand the past.

TDU's Long Fight Against the Two-Thirds Rule

The “2/3 to reject” rule has a decades-long history in the Teamsters Union. TDU was formed in 1976, and immediately launched a campaign to get rid of it.  

In 1987, we won a big victory in partially ridding our union of “minority rule on contracts.”  Prior to 1987, the 2/3-to-reject was absolute: no matter how many Teamsters voted, it took 2/3 to reject a contract which the IBT leaders deemed a “final offer.” And old guard officials used it.

As TDU became active, more contracts got rejected. In 1976, carhaulers rejected their national agreement, and it was imposed by the 2/3 rule. In 1982, UPS workers narrowly rejected a sell-out contract, and it was imposed. In 1987, the Master Freight contract was rejected by 64%, and it was imposed.

TDU sued over irregularities in that vote. Ron Carey sued also. In 1987, the IBT leadership, with the RICO racketeering lawsuit brewing, knew that we were near to winning the right to vote for IBT leaders. Under pressure, they settled up, and changed the 2/3 rule.

We won the partial eradication of minority rule. But, like many victories, it was not a total win. Part of the rotten rule still exists: if less than half members participate in the vote. 

We won other contract rights for all Teamsters. In 1984, in the Bauman v Presser case, TDU won an injunction and forced the UPS contract ballots to be impounded, and a new vote was held. IBT President Jackie Presser tried to conduct a “quickie” contract vote, with no time for members to meet, discuss, and distribute leaflets on the contract. That’s how we now get a reasonable period to consider contracts.

The Return of Minority Rule on Contracts

Since 1987—31 years—no national contract has been imposed by minority rule.

Until now.

Even Hoffa has not used minority rule on contracts. In the last UPS contract vote, in 2013, 18 supplements and riders were rejected. Ten of those were rejected by less than 2/3, with less than half of members participating in the vote. The IBT renegotiated and re-voted each of them.

What changed from 2013 till now? Nothing, except Denis Taylor decided to impose his rotten deal. But the buck doesn’t stop with Taylor, it stops with James Hoffa.

Members demand renegotiation. Several International Vice Presidents are demanding a GEB meeting be convened to fix it.

Keep up the fight on this contract.

Know your history. Know who has fought for Teamster rights. Get involved—be part of making a strong and democratic Teamsters Union.

We have an organization and framework to do it: Teamsters for a Democratic Union (TDU). 

Related Articles

Know Your History To Make More History: The Battle For Our Contract Rights

We have a legal right to a fair and informed vote on our national contracts. But our rights have not come without Teamsters for a Democratic Union taking on big battles.  Here is a summary of some key legal – and membership – victories involving our rights in national Teamster contracts. We Won the Right to a Fair and Informed Vote Bauman v Presser.  This case set a precedent for a “fair and informed” vote. ...

How TDU Won Contract Rights for All Teamsters

Membership Rights at Contract Time Teamster members do have power and democratic rights when it comes to voting on their contracts. It was not always this way. But Teamster members united through TDU to win key rights at contract time. TDU won the Right to a Majority Vote on Teamster Contracts Teamster members have the right to vote on their contracts by majority rule. This might seem like a no-brainer. But before 1987, it took...

Teamster History: How the "Club" Changed Our Union

The first "$100,000Club" in 1976.(Copies of thishistoric book areavailable from TDU.) November 26, 2012: It started in the mid-1970s, with an organization called PROD, the Professional Drivers Council. PROD collected hundreds of LM-2 financial reports on Teamster locals, joint councils and the International and began to analyze them, tracing all the multiple salaries, family connections, and more. The "$100,000 Club" was born. In 1979 PROD and TDU joined hands in one organization. TDU has published...

Women's History Month

March 14, 2012: TDU celebrates the contributions of Teamster women to our union and to labor struggles for social and economic equality. Building strong unions has paid off for women workers—literally. Women in unions earn higher wages, have better health care coverage, more rights to paid sick leave and vacation, pension plans, and more rights and power on the job. Women union members make $2 an hour more than nonunion women workers. The difference for...

1989: Teamsters Win Right to Vote for Top Office

When TDU was founded in 1976, Teamster members didn’t have the right to vote for top officers and the union was controlled by organized crime. TDU members turned in over 100,000 signatures demanding the Right to Vote at the 1986 Teamster Convention.TDU set out to change that. In 1985, over a hundred thousand members signed a petition demanding the Right to Vote. Then in 1988, the Justice Department went to court against the union’s leadership...
Get Advice Join TDU Donate

Recent News

Latest Union Financial Reports Available Online

Find out more about Teamster finances from your local to the International Union. The latest union financial reports filed with the U.S. Department of Labor are available online.

How Rank & File Power Dramatically Changed Teamster Finances

CEO salaries have exploded over the last forty years. But salaries and perks for top Teamster officials have been reduced over the same period. Teamsters for a Democratic Union (TDU) and rank-and-file Teamsters made it happen. Here’s how.

View More News Posts